Hamilton v. Artel Video Systems, Inc. et al
The Firm successfully represented Artel Video Systems, Inc. (‘Artel’) and Artel three executives in obtaining dismissal of all of Plaintiff’s claims against all four Defendants. Hamilton v. Artel Video Systems, Inc., et al. Civil Action No.: 08-1560 (Middlesex Superior Court, October 8, 2009). Among other things, Plaintiff’s Complaint alleged: pregnancy discrimination; disability discrimination; failure to reasonably accommodate Plaintiff’s pregnancy; violation of the Massachusetts Civil Rights Act (‘MCRA’); and claims of individual liability against the three named individuals for allegedly aiding and abetting in the discrimination. On October 31, 2008, the Court dismissed the MCRA claim for failure to state a claim. Subsequently, on October 8, 2009, the Court granted Defendants’ summary judgment motion in its entirety, dismissing all of Plaintiff’s remaining claims. Attorney for the Defendants is Sara Goldsmith Schwartz.